link to the article about it-
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/world/asia/22policy.html?_r=1
at the very least it shows a president willing to put his own political standing over the lives of american military service men and women.
the best quote from the article:
“I have to say that,” Mr. Obama replied. “I can’t let this be a war without end, and I can’t lose the whole Democratic Party.”
so, yeah, the democrat party is more important than killing terrorists before they kill us which is funny. why? apparently our president obama would like to have terrorists attack us while he simultaneously attacks us through his fiscally imprisoning policies. so the obama answer to a complete soviet style revolution with millions murdered and the rest shoved into poverty is for our government to shove us into poverty while terrorists are allowed to train to kill us in a war torn country that our president abandoned, thereby having a foreign scapegoat that will allow the continuing destruction of america from within even as we are killed by terrorists trained in afghanistan.
brilliant.
and tantamount to TREASON.
best of luck obama. politics goes a long way. all the way until chicago is nuked. carry on. and may god damn you to hell for the first successful terrorist attack that you allowed to happen.
later.